In a speech last week, Hillary Clinton said she wanted “shared prosperity”. I wonder, is “shared prosperity” a euphemism for “socialism”?
Don’t take me too seriously. I don’t.
Major Mike’s Musings
June 4, 2007 at 10:15 am
Shared Prosperity
4
-
The Villages Weather
Our Next Cruise
It's not enough to be going on a cruise this year. We're also booked on an Eastern Caribbean in 10 months and 2 days.
Now Reading
Planned books:
- Shadow Divers by Robert Kurson
- Nothing But Trouble by Michael McGarrity
- Jolie Blon’s Bounce by James Lee Burke
- Shoot Him If He Runs by Stuart Woods
- Choke by Stuart Woods
Current books:
-
Dark Harbour by Stuart Woods
-
Following Jesus Without Embarrassing God by Tony Campolo
Recent books:
- Motor Mouth (Alex Barnaby Series #2) by Janet Evanovich
- The Hanged Man’s Song by John Sandford
- Two Dollar Bill by Stuart Woods
- In The Hour Before Midnight by Jack Higgins
- The Narrows by Michael Connelly
12:54 pm on June 4th, 2007 1
I’ve heard that when we begin to live in love (above all) that socialism won’t be necessary. I think that’s true.
2:38 pm on June 4th, 2007 2
It’s not necessary now. Perhaps a better way to put it is that when we live in love, no government is necessary.
9:47 am on June 5th, 2007 3
A.men.
10:07 am on June 6th, 2007 4
Living in Love …. now THAT would be a tremendous accomplishment! I don’t think that’s where Sen. Clinton is heading however. I hate to think of America becoming a socialist nation but, the dems seem determined to make it such.