SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
Shared Prosperity
June 4th, 2007 by Mike

In a speech last week, Hillary Clinton said she wanted “shared prosperity”. I wonder, is “shared prosperity” a euphemism for “socialism”?

© 2007 – 2008, J. M. Erickson. All rights reserved.


4 Responses  
  • Yo Kid writes:
    June 4th, 200712:54at

    I’ve heard that when we begin to live in love (above all) that socialism won’t be necessary. I think that’s true.

  • Mike writes:
    June 4th, 200714:38at

    It’s not necessary now. Perhaps a better way to put it is that when we live in love, no government is necessary.

  • Yo Kid writes:
    June 5th, 200709:47at

    A.men.

  • Bea writes:
    June 6th, 200710:07at

    Living in Love …. now THAT would be a tremendous accomplishment! I don’t think that’s where Sen. Clinton is heading however. I hate to think of America becoming a socialist nation but, the dems seem determined to make it such. :sad:



SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa

Bad Behavior has blocked 481 access attempts in the last 7 days.